M = D x V
M = Mass
D = Density
V = Volume
N = Neutron
Ve+ = Anti neutrino
P = Proton
Ve- = Neutrino
MN = (VN) (-a x -b x +c)
MVe+ = (VVe+) / (-d x -e x +f)
MP= (VP) (a x b x -c)
MVe- = (VVe-) / (d x e x -f) (I forgot this division sign in the picture above).
Two entangled (intersected) fields that vary periodically with the same or opposite phases create in their mutual intersection four new fields or dimensions whose density and volume vary periodically with time.
I consider that those two entangled fields are gravitational and the new four fields created in their intersection are the subatomic particles of the shared “atomic nucleus”.
In the picture attached I have represented two entangled fields tat vary with opposite phases; they create “fermions”: when one expands the another contracts. Iif their phases were equal they would create bosons.
In the momentum 1, when the left gravitational curvature is contracted and the right is expanded, the field N (neutron) has an antisymmetric position and volume with respect to the field Ve+ (anti-neutrino).
In the momentum 2, when the left gravitational field is expanded and the right one is contracted, the field Ve- (neutrino) has an antisymmetric position and volume with respect to the field P (proton).
So when it comes to fermions, neutrons and protons are antiparticles that exist at different times, it could be said that proton is the virtual antiparticle of neutron and viceversa. And in the same sense the antineutrino is the virtual antiparticle of the neutrino and viceversa.
But the masses of proton and neutrino (or neutron and antineutrino) are not inversely proportional. There is a periodical change on their masses because the periodical variations of their densities are not proportional with the variation of their volumes.
In the case of the Neutron field at momentum 1, its volume receives the double pressure of the vectors -a and -b, but it receives too an external pressure produce by the vector +c that is external with respect to the “mass” of N.
And the Antineutrino Ve+ experiences de double decompression of d and e, but it experiences the external decompression of f.
When in momentum 2 the field N (neutron) is transformed into Ve- (neutrino) experiencing an increase in its volume and a density loss, it occurs a loss of density that is not proportional with the volume increase. Its loss of mass is caused by the force of decompression that the vector -f produces on Ve.
I think that current physics is not detecting properly the Neutrino field/subatomic particle’s mass. Are they measuring only its lack of density but not all its volume? The neutrino field would have the same mass than the neutron or the proton (with inversely proportional densities and volumes) if we did not consider the extra compression (in the case of neutron and proton) or decompression (in the case of neutrino or antineutrino) produced by the gravitational variation of the mentioned entangled gravitational fields.
The increasing kinetic energy that exists inside the subatomic particles/fields in the case of neutron (a prior neutrino that transforms later into neutron) or proton (a prior anti-neutrino that transforms into proton) is caused by the contraction (the reducing volume) of these fields, causing a pushing force inside them; the decreasing kinetic motions that exist inside the subatomic particles/fields neutrino and antineutrino are consequence of the decompression of these fields (their decreasing volume), here there are not pushing forces that create the motions inside them.
The periodical variation of the entangled gravitational fields can be consider like Van der Waals and Casimir’s forces.
I consider that space is not vacuum and gravity is a force of pressure that creates a gravitational and periodically variable curvature. I think that gravity has a decisive role at atomic level and it is represented, like force of pressure, by the Planck constant.
Electrons are fields (created by those gravitational intersections) that move towards the left side (electrons) or the right side (positrons) when it comes to fermions.
I consider the vectors a, b, d, e form the picture above are “quarks”. They create all subatomic particles, even electrons and positrons as you can read in this post on this blog
+C vector produces the confinement of -a and -b quarks and encloses the kinetic energy inside the Neutron field N; -C vector produces de confinement of +a and +b quarks and encloses the kinetic energy inside the proton field P. Inversely, +f and -f vectors do not enclose the kinetic (and here inertial) energy that decays in neutrino (Ve-) and antineutrino (Ve+) fields.
The symmetry of the two entangled gravitational fields that vary with opposite phases (in the case of fermions) and the fields created created in their intersection, is broken periodically toward the left or right side where the gravitational entangled field that contracts is placed, in the horizontal axis. (In the case of bosons, with equal phases of variation, the symmetry periodically in the vertical axis, the displacements are up and down).
The mass of all these particles/fields, Neutron (N), proton (P), neutrino (Ve-), antineutrino (Ve+), will depend too on the spatial distance between the gravitational fields that entangled creating the electromagnetic particles/fields in their intersection.
In the picture above I represented only two entangled gravitational fields, left and right, that vary periodically, but it could be possible to represent four gravitational fields (one by each spatial direction, N, S, E, W) that entangle with a central gravitational field.
This model would be aplicable at astrophysical level too: celestial bodies would be moved because of the periodical contraction of the field that they orbit. Our universe would exist because of the entanglement of two other universes/fields, each one depending on other two entangled/universes fields and so on in an infinite way.
The big bang would be consequence of the simultaneous contraction (if we think in therms of fermions) of two entangled field/universes and it would be accompanied simultaneously by a big-anty-silence. Later, it would exist a big silence and a bing anti-bang.
It could be possible to extract much more consequences of this model, like the existence of antigravity like a force of Nature, or the possible existence of a anti-Earth as you can read in other posts on this blog.